网站导航   4000-006-150  
小站教育
新托福口语高频话题范文
学生选择在小站备考:30天 525672名,今日申请3255人    备考咨询 >>

【听力素材】托福巴朗听力原文——Linguistics Class

2016年01月21日10:31 来源:小站整理
参与(3) 阅读(6286)
摘要:托福考试中听力部分占据的比例比较高,所以听力能力的高低也是决定考试成绩的最大因素。那么,现在我们就为大家带来巴朗听力的内容,一起提升我们的托福听力能力吧。

托福听力的备考中,选择一个适合自己的听力素材是非常重要的。而巴郎听力则是很多学生冲刺高分听力的必备选择。由于他的内容基本可以跟国外讲座水平接轨,所以是非常适合作为托福听力考前练习素材。那么在以下内容中我们就为大家带来巴朗听力原文,希望能为大家的备考带来帮助。

【听力素材】托福巴朗听力原文——Linguistics Class图1


Professor: What comes to mind when I say the word grammar?

$ Student 1: That’s easy. English class and lots of rules.

$ Student 2: Memorizing parts of speech . . . like nouns and verbs.

$ Student 3: Diagramming sentences.

$ Professor:

$ Well, yes, that’s fairly typical. But today we’re going to look at grammar from the point of view of the linguist, and to do that, we really have to consider three distinct grammars for every language.

The first grammar is referred to as a mental grammar. And that’s what a speaker of a language knows, often implicitly, about the grammar of that language. This has also been called linguistic competence and from that term competence grammar has become popular. I like to think of it, of mental or competence grammar, I mean . . . I like to think of it as an incredibly complex system that allows a speaker to produce language that other speakers can understand. It includes the sounds, the vocabulary, the order of words in sentences and . . . even the appropriateness of a topic or a word in a particular social situation. And what’s so amazing is that most of us carry this knowledge around in our heads and use it without much reflection.

One way to clarify mental or competence grammar is to ask a friend a question about a sentence. Your friend probably won’t know why it’s correct, but that friend will know if it’s correct. So one of the features of mental or competence grammar is this incredible sense of correctness and the ability to hear something that "sounds odd" in a language. Haven’t you had the experience of hearing a sentence, and it stood out to you? It just wasn’t quite right? For native speakers we can call this ability native intuition, but even language learners who’ve achieved a high level of competence in a second language will be able to give similar intuitive responses even if they can’t explain the rules. So that’s mental grammar or competence grammar.

Okay then, that brings us to the second type of grammar, and this is what linguists are most concerned about. This is descriptive grammar, which is a description of what the speakers know intuitively about a language. Linguists try to discover the underlying rules of mental or competence grammar and describe them objectively. So descriptive grammar is a model of competence grammar, and as such, it has to be based on the best effort of a linguist, and consequently, subject to criticism and even disagreement from other linguists. Because no matter how skilled a linguist is, describing grammar is an enormous task. In the first place, the knowledge is incredibly vast and complex; in the second place, the language itself is changing even while it’s being described; and finally, the same data can be organized in different but equally correct ways in order to arrive at generalizations. And the ultimate goal of a descriptive grammar is to formulate generalizations about a language that accurately reflect the mental rules that speakers have in their heads.

But, getting back to what most people think of as grammar-the grammar that we may have learned in school. That’s very different from either competence grammar or descriptive grammar because the rules aren’t meant to describe language at all. They’re meant to prescribe and judge language as good or bad. And this kind of grammar is called, not surprisingly, prescriptive grammar because of its judgmental perspective. Again, to contrast prescriptive grammar with descriptive grammar, just think of descriptive generalizations as accepting the language that a speaker uses in an effort to describe it and recognizing that there may be several dialects that are used by various groups of speakers and that any one speaker will probably choose to use different language depending on the formality, for example, of the situation. On the other hand, prescriptive rules are rigid and subject to enforcement. Prescriptivists want to make all speakers conform to one standard in all situations, and that tends to be a very formal level of language all the time.

Now which of these types of grammar do you think you were learning in school when you had to memorize parts of speech and rules and diagram sentences?

【听力素材】托福巴朗听力原文——Linguistics Class图2

$ Student 2: Sounds like prescriptive grammar to me.

$ Professor:

$ Precisely. But how did prescriptive rules get to be accepted, at least in the schools? And probably even more important, why are so many of these rules disregarded even by well-educated speakers in normal situations?

$ Student 1: Did you say disregarded?

$ Professor:

$ I did. Some of you may recall that during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Europe, Latin was considered the perfect language and was used by the educated classes. The argument for the perfection of Latin was reinforced by the fact that Latin had become a written language and, consequently . . . Latin had stopped changing in the normal ways that spoken languages do, so the rules were also fixed, and for many writers of English during that period, the rules of Latin were held as a standard for all languages, including English. But the problem was that English had a different origin and very different constructions. For example, how many times have you heard the prescriptive rule, "never end a sentence with a preposition?" This is a Latin rule, but it doesn’t apply to English, so it sounds very formal and even strange when this Latin rule is enforced. Now, how many of you would say, "What are we waiting for?" I think most of us would prefer it to "For what are we waiting?" But as you see, this breaks the rule-the Latin rule, that is.

$ Student 2:

$ So we’re really learning Latin rules in English classes. No wonder I was confused. But wouldn’t you think that . . . well, that things would change? I mean, Latin hasn’t been recognized as a world language for a long time.

$ Professor:

$ You’re right. But the reason that prescriptive rules survive is the school system. Teachers promote the prescriptive grammar as the standard for the school, and consequently for the educated class. And "good" language is a requisite for social mobility, even when it’s very dissimilar to the mental grammar or the descriptive grammar of a language.




特别申明:本文内容来源网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请立即与我们联系contactus@zhan.com,我们将及时处理。
看完仍有疑问?想要更详细的答案?
备考问题一键咨询提分方案
获取专业解答

相关文章

【托福考前必备词汇】常考同义词汇(J-M) 【托福考前必备词汇】听力常用习语汇总 【托福听力必备资料】常见特色词汇汇总 【托福提分要诀】一个月提高托福听力的方法详解 【初入托福必备】托福词汇之听力常见的生态学词汇汇总 【托福考前必备词汇】听力常用习语——没精打采 【托福备考】托福词汇备考 听力常见物理词汇汇总 【托福备考】托福词汇备考 听力中常见的政治词汇汇总
小站教育托福官方群

群号:857201332

「扫二维码 加入群聊」
加入
托福关键词
版权申明| 隐私保护| 意见反馈| 联系我们| 关于我们| 网站地图| 最新资讯
© 2011-2024 ZHAN.com All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备13042692号-23 举报电话:4000-006-150
沪公网安备 31010602002658号
增值电信业务经营许可证:沪B2-20180682