网站导航     在线客服  
全部
2018托福真题解析汇总
学生选择在小站备考:30天 494995名,今日申请5077人    备考咨询 >>

【托福写作资料】小站独家深度解析TPO33——综合写作

2014年06月27日14:08 来源:小站整理
参与(2) 阅读(10936)

托福备考资料免费领取

免费领取
摘要:TPO33已经横空出世,就被无数托福备考考生疯狂下载。小站教育先声夺人,更是想同学之所需,第一时间以最棒的师资力量深度全面解析TPO33。

【托福写作资料】小站独家深度解析TPO33——综合写作图1

TPO 33 Writing - Integrated Writing

Reading Part

Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of |locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in diameter; and many are ornamented to some degree. Archaeologists do not agree about their purpose and meaning, but there are several theories.

One theory is that the carved stone balls were weapons used in hunting or fighting. Some of the stone balls have been found with holes in them, and many have grooves on the surface. It is possible that a cord was strung through the holes or laid in the grooves around the ball. Holding the stone balls at the end of the cord would have allowed a person to swing it around or throw it.

A second theory is that the carved stone balls were used as part of a primitive system of weights and measures. The fact that they are so nearly uniform in size - at 70 mm in diameter-suggests that the balls were interchangeable and represented some standard unit of measure. They could have been used as standard weights to measure quantities of grain or other food, or anything that needed to be measured by weight on a balance or scale for the purpose of trade.

A third theory is that the carved stone balls served a social purpose as opposed to a practical or utilitarian one. This view is supported by the fact that many stone balls have elaborate designs. The elaborate carving suggests that the stones may have marked the important social status of their owners.

TPO33写作解析完全版点击查看:《小站独家深度解析TPO33写作答案详解

Listening Part

None of the three theories presented in the reading passage are very convincing.

First, the stone balls as hunting weapons, common Neolithic weapons such as arrowheads and hand axes generally show signs of wear, so we should expect that if the stone balls had been used as weapons for hunting of fighting, they too would show signs of that use. Many of the stone balls would be cracked or have pieces broken off. However, the surfaces of the balls are generally well preserved, showing little or no wear or damage.

Second, the carved stone balls maybe remarkably uniform in size, but their masses vary too considerably to have been used as uniform weights. This is because the stone balls were made of different types of stone including sandstone, green stone and quartzite. Each type of stone has a different density. Some types of stone are heavier than others just as a handful of feathers weighs less than a handful of rocks. Two balls of the same size are different weights depending on the type of stone they are made of. Therefore, the balls could not have been used as a primitive weighing system.

Third, it's unlikely that the main purpose of the balls was as some kind of social marker. A couple of facts are inconsistent with this theory. For one thing, while some of the balls are carved with intricate patterns, many others have markings that are extremely simple, too simple to make the balls look like status symbols. Furthermore, we know that in Neolithic Britain, when someone died, particularly a high-ranking person, they were usually buried with their possessions. However, none of the carved stone balls have been actually found in tombs or graves. That makes it unlikely that the balls were personal possessions that marked a person's status within the community.

TPO33写作解析完全版点击查看:《小站独家深度解析TPO33写作答案详解

【托福写作资料】小站独家深度解析TPO33——综合写作图2

Sample answer

The author in the reading passage explores three major functions of the carved stone balls. However, in the lecture, the professor respectively contradicts all his assertions by using three specific points as supports.

First, even though the reading passage suggests that the stone balls were weapons because of the holes and grooves on their surface, the professor argues that the stone balls didn’t show signs of use, which means they are neither cracked nor broken and thus cannot be used as weapons.

Second, despite the statement in the reading passage that the stone balls were used as primitive weighing system due to their uniform size, the professor contends that their masses vary too considerably from each other. Therefore, the balls could not function as weighing system.

Third, the author asserts that the stone balls served a social purpose owing to their elaborate designs while the professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that the balls were carved with not only intricate patterns but also simple ones, besides, none of the balls were found in the ancient tombs or graves. Consequently, it’s impossible that the balls were social markers.

TPO33写作解析完全版点击查看:《小站独家深度解析TPO33写作答案详解

小站托福
托福官方Q群 群号:857201332
精华资料下载 在线答疑 考友抱团
还可以第一时间参与福利活动哦
一键加入
特别申明:本文内容来源网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请立即与我们联系contactus#zhan.com,我们将及时处理。
感觉茅塞顿开?现在就去练练手吧!
大家都在学

看完这篇文章有何感觉?已经有2人表态,50%的人喜欢

相关文章

最新托福独立写作完整版题目+范文汇总 【小站原创】TPO40托福综合写作题目文本及答案解析 【小站原创】TPO40托福独立写作题目文本及答案解析 【小站原创】TPO41托福综合写作题目文本及答案解析 【小站原创】TPO48托福独立写作题目文本及答案解析 【小站原创】TPO49托福综合写作题目文本及答案解析 【小站原创】TPO48托福综合写作题目文本及答案解析 【小站原创】TPO45托福综合写作题目文本及答案解析
托福关键词