网站导航     在线客服  
全部
2018托福机经
   首页    托福   备考心经   TPO   正文
学生选择在小站备考:30天 369449名,今日申请5461人    备考咨询 >>

【小站原创】TPO7托福阅读Passage2原文文本+题目+答案解析

2018年01月22日16:20 来源:小站整理
参与(0) 阅读(606)
摘要:TPO托福模考软件是目前市面上最好用的托福备考资料了,托福考生一般都会拿TPO来进行托福考试的练习。这里小编将为大家整理了完整理了TPO7托福阅读Passage2原文文本+题目+答案解析,帮助大家更好的进行托福听力备考

现在大家在进行托福备考时TPO托福模考软件相信是大家用的最多的工具了,对于托福成绩的提升是非常有帮助的。托福听力可以说是整个托福考试当中比较重要的一个部分,如何利用现有资料TPO模考软件来提升大家的托福成绩呢?今天小编在这里整理了TPO7托福阅读Passage2原文文本+题目+答案解析来分享给大家,希望对大家托福听力备考有帮助。

TPO7托福模考软件配套资料汇总→→点击进入

【小站原创】TPO7托福阅读Passage2原文文本+题目+答案解析图1

TPO7托福阅读Passage2原文文本

Ancient Rome and Greece

There is a quality of cohesiveness about the Roman world that applied neither to Greece nor perhaps to any other civilization, ancient or modern. Like the stone of Roman wall, which were held together both by the regularity of the design and by that peculiarly powerful Roman cement, so the various parts of the Roman realm were bonded into a massive, monolithic entity by physical, organizational, and psychological controls. The physical bonds included the network of military garrisons, which were stationed in every province, and the network of stone-built roads that linked the provinces with Rome. The organizational bonds were based on the common principles of law and administration and on the universal army of officials who enforced common standards of conduct. The psychological controls were built on fear and punishment—on the absolute certainty that anyone or anything that threatened the authority of Rome would be utterly destroyed.

The source of Roman obsession with unity and cohesion may well have lain in the pattern of Rome’s early development. Whereas Greece had grown from scores of scattered cities, Rome grew from one single organism. While the Greek world had expanded along the Mediterranean seas lanes, the Roman world was assembled by territorial conquest. Of course, the contrast is not quite so stark: in Alexander the Great the Greeks had found the greatest territorial conqueror of all time; and the Romans, once they moved outside Italy, did not fail to learn the lessons of sea power. Yet the essential difference is undeniable. The key to the Greek world lay in its high-powered ships; the key to Roman power lay in its marching legions. The Greeks were wedded to the sea; the Romans, to the land. The Greek was a sailor at heart; the Roman, a landsman.

Certainly, in trying to explain the Roman phenomenon, one would have to place great emphasis on this almost instinct for the territorial imperative. Roman priorities lay in the organization, exploitation, and defense of their territory. In all probability it was the fertile plain of Latium, where the Latins who founded Rome originated, that created the habits and skills of landed settlement, landed property, landed economy, landed administration, and a land-based society. From this arose the Roman genius for military organization and orderly government. In turn, a deep attachment to the land, and to the stability which rural life engenders, fostered the Roman virtues: gravitas, a sense of responsibility, pietas, a sense of devotion to family and country, and iustitia, a sense of the natural order.

Modern attitudes to Roman civilization range from the infinitely impressed to the thoroughly disgusted. As always, there are the power worshippers, especially among historians, who are predisposed to admire whatever is strong, who feel more attracted to the might of Rome than to the subtlety of Greece. At the same time, there is a solid body of opinion that dislikes Rome. For many, Rome is at best the imitator and the continuator of Greece on a larger scale. Greek civilization had quality; Rome, mere quantity. Greece was original; Rome, derivative. Greece had style; Rome had money. Greece was the inventor; Rome, the research and development division. Such indeed was the opinion of some of the more intellectual Romans. “Had the Greeks held novelty in such disdain as we,” asked Horace in his epistle, “what work of ancient date would now exist?”

Rome’s debt to Greece was enormous. The Romans adopted Greek religion and moral philosophy. In literature, Greek writers were consciously used as models by their Latin successors. It was absolutely accepted that an educated Roman should be fluent in Greek. In speculative philosophy and the sciences, the Romans made virtually no advance on early achievements.

Yet it would be wrong to suggest that Rome was somehow a junior partner in Greco-Roman civilization. The Roman genius was projected into new spheres—especially into those of law, military organization, administration, and engineering. Moreover, the tensions that arose within the Roman state produced literary and artistic sensibilities of the highest order. It was

查看TPO7托福阅读Passage2的题目请进入下一页→→→

更多最新,最in的托福资讯,关注公众号:小站托福(ID:xiaozhantuofu2015)
感觉茅塞顿开?现在就去练练手吧!
大家都在学

看完这篇文章有何感觉?已经有0人表态,0%的人喜欢

相关文章

【小站原创】TPO40-51题目及答案解析全收录(完整版) 【小站原创】TPO40托福阅读文本及答案解析(Ancien... 【小站原创】TPO48托福阅读文本及答案解析(Chines... 【小站原创】TPO41托福阅读文本及答案解析(Navajo... 【小站原创】TPO41托福阅读文本及答案解析(Climat... 【小站原创】TPO49托福阅读文本及答案解析(Ancien... 【小站原创】TPO40托福阅读文本及答案解析(Amphib... 【小站原创】TPO47托福阅读文本及答案解析(Coral ...

10天托福知道热度排行

10天托福知道点赞榜

【小站托福官网】TOEFL托福考试为您提供最新托福备考资料,托福机经预测,托福听力、口语、阅读、写作、词汇真题下载,更有toefl模拟考试、托福报名、托福培训等特色服务。
版权申明| 隐私保护| 意见反馈| 联系我们| 关于我们| 网站地图| 最新资讯

©{beginDate}-{endDate} ZHAN.com All Rights Reserved. {hbText}