网站导航     在线客服  
新托福备考大规划
学生选择在小站备考:30天 416322名,今日申请132人    备考咨询 >>
已发布
2018-01-13小站托福类独立写作机经

2018年1月13日托福独立写作重点预测大范围机经

更新时间:2018-01-08 13:20          

摘要: 独立写作Independent Task的考试时间为30分钟,要求考生针对某个问题提出自己的观点,阐述自己的看法。通常一篇独立作文字数应不少于300词,字数没有上限。评分人会从考生如何展开论点、组织文章结构、并运用语言表达自己的观点。独立写作机经全部出自小站2010-2017托福题库,均为历年真题。这里为大家带的是2018年1月13日托福考试小站大范围独立写作重点预测机经。

订阅:0
下载:226
浏览:2183
立即下载完整机经
手机打开
手机打开的二维码 扫一扫手机打开

1月13日机经预测

1月13日考试说明

小站教研中心对2010-2017年大陆&北美托福题库进行了系统化的整理,并对听说读写四科的考题进行了分科查重,摸索出了最契合目前考试趋势的托福出题规律。基于出题规律,小站教研中心针对每场考试,从题库中挑选出最有可能考到的题目,整理出大范围重点预测和小范围核心预测2套机经预测。大范围机经在考试前2周的周五发送,小范围在考试当周的周二发送。机经会根据考情变化,定期更换新题。2017年口语旧题命中率达32.94%,写作旧题命中率达65.96%。希望大家考前充分利用机经,在考试中取得理想的成绩!

托福独立写作 Independent Writing 共80题

第1题 来源:北美 话题分类:Education 属性:大范围重点预测

预测题目
Some parents do not agree with the way teachers are teaching their children. Do you think that parents should express their disapproval to the teachers?
解题思路
总观点: 支持向老师表达意见。 分论点1: 家长向老师表达意见是件正常的事。 论述:运用了自然延伸的论证方法,阐述了家长有权利关注自己孩子的成长并保护孩子不受伤害。 分论点2: 家长表达个人对于教育的想法是合理的。 论述: 运用了自然延伸和举例的论证方式,提到向老师提意见是件好事,并且以自己的经历为例进一步支持了分论点的论述。 让步段: 向老师提意见也会有一些问题存在。 论述: 运用了自然延伸的论证方式,说明了向老师提意见可能出现的问题。 结论: 家长应该和老师交流意见。
范文
Teachers play an important role when children are young. However, nowadays more and more parents are concerned about whether their children can be well educated by teachers. Sometimes, they have different opinions about teacher’s teaching methods, but they wonder if it’s proper to tell the teacher directly. As for me, I think parents should express their disagreement. Firstly, It is normal that parents communicate with teachers about different opinions, whatever the teacher are fond of or not. No one would deny that sending their kids to school, parents have the right to pay close attention to the growth of their kids. There

第2题 来源:北美 话题分类:Education 属性:大范围重点预测

预测题目
Some people think it would help students to learn if teachers give time for discussion in class, others think that class discussion is unnecessary. What is your opinion and why?
解题思路
Two-way Brainstorming To discuss in class 1. To identify the problems in understanding 2. To practise communication skills 3. To reinforce what we have acquired in class Not to discuss 1. Discussion is less effective as there are too many topics in the process to distract people. 2. Arguments in the discussion without too much evidence is barely a waste of time, which may also lead to quarrels in the end. 3. The noise made by class discussion may interfere students in the nearby classrooms.
范文
Model Answer: Not to discuss Innovation, in the contemporary society when creative ideas are advocated worldwide, not only lies its significance in high-tech industries, but in education. A handful of techniques have been introduced into classroom in order to make the teachers better understood. Specifically, discussion in class is a controversial one, the pros and cons of which have equalized. To me, I hold a negative view. To start with, discussion is less effective as there are too many topics in the process to distract people. No matter how many advantages in-call discussion may bring students, all the merits come about based on one premise—students are keen to the topic discussed.

第3题 来源:北美 话题分类:Work 属性:大范围重点预测

预测题目
A leader should have strong opinions and do not change his or her mind on these opinions.
解题思路
Two-way Brainstorming Agree 1. A leader makes strategic plans, which directs the organization and is unchangeable. 2. Effective employees should make the strategic plan the leader made possible rather than deny it in the process. 3. A leader keeps adjusting his opinion according to others’ judgement is not reliable enough. Disagree 1. A leader should make a decision based on others’ expertise. 2. Innovative ideas should be welcomed. 3. Proper adjustment to the leader’s decision is to make the implementation process smooth.
范文
Model Answer: Agree Unlike the traditional organizations where the leader decided everything, modern companies encourage democracy that leaders welcome innovative suggestions from staff. In some cases, in order to encourage staff to think creatively, there are special rewards for anyone who proposes contributing ideas. Nevertheless, concerning the effectiveness of a leader, he/she should still be determined, not easily affected by others’ opinions. To begin with, a leader makes strategic plans, which directs the organization and is unchangeable. A strategic plan is an organization’s process of defining its strategy, or direction, and making decisions on allocating its resources to pursue this strategy. It may also extend to control mechanisms for guid

第4题 来源:大陆 话题分类:Education 属性:大范围重点预测

预测题目
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study.
解题思路
总观点:在校大学生不用选修基本科学课程 分论点1:大学应该是一个人们专修适合自己性格和特长专业的地方 论述:举反例论证若大学生一年都学科学课程所带来的弊端 分论点2:人们不能低估兴趣的影响,特别是在大学阶段 论述:从逼迫学生学习自己不敢兴趣课程的弊端和科学专业学生本身根本不用学习科学基础课程两个反面来进行论述 分论点3:额外的课程会收取额外的费用并且需要额外教学资源的投入 论述:给出两个合理的解决方案。学校可以选择出高价请新的教师或者抽调现有的部分教师来上课。 结论:大学本身应该更注重专业课程的提升而不是一些基础课程
范文
As the so-called cradle of knowledge and talents, universities are often placed with too much expectation as if they can reshape a student into a person with omniscience after years of university study. Facts always go against the grain however. Then we can hear almost the same voice from the media, “we need a more comprehensive course structure to cover every spot of how the world functions”. Yet with a second thought, does the word really make sense, or does the society really expect university graduates to be in that way? Hopefully not. Therefore, I am fully against the idea of introducing basic science into university course system and advocate a more practical sense to view university education. First of all, a reasonable definition of university is a place where people can get professional knowledge in the field they choose. For the first day a student entering into the university, s/he embraces the dream to become a specialist in a specific area. With that goal rooted in mind, s/he selects major related courses, attends useful seminars or wo

第5题 来源:北美 话题分类:Activity 属性:大范围重点预测

预测题目
Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school. Others say that children should make these decisions on their own. Which view do you agree with and why?
解题思路
总观点: 同意老师和家长决定孩子们的课后活动。 分论点1: 家长和老师经验丰富,能够给予孩子更有效的建议和帮助。 论述:运用举例的论证方法,以Bob为例,阐述了母亲对他的帮助,因而支持了分论点1。 分论点2: 能够预防孩子进行危险活动。 论述: 运用了自然延伸和举例的论证方式,提到孩子缺乏常识,很多时候无法做出正确的抉择,并以发生在自己家乡的一件事为例进一步支撑分论点2。 让步段: 孩子进行自己喜爱的活动会获得更多快乐,但是有家长和老师的帮助,他们会收获更多。 论述: 运用了举例论证方式,以表哥为例,阐述了他的老师对他的帮助。 结论: 让家长和老师来决定孩子的课后活动会更好。
范文
Nowadays, some claim that kids should choose what to do after school by themselves because parents and teachers could not know what children really like. However, in my opinion, both teachers and parents should be responsible for children's mental and physical health, so they are entitled to make decisions about children’s after-class activities. To start with, parents and teachers have abundant life experience, so they can give some really useful and helpful suggestions to students, which can help them learn things more efficiently and effectively. After all, children need to be cultivated to form good habits. Take my little brother Bob for example. Bob is a boy who loves to read books a lot, and he regards author as his future career. However, what he does is only to read some novels for several months because he knows little about how to improve writing skills. Fortunately, his