"Reading 说 Wilhelm Naundorff是法国lost 的 prince。
原因一。 这个人深知王子早年的生活习惯和王室的利益和习惯还有家庭情况。
原因二， 王室早期的仆人们都觉得他的行为举止很想当年的王子。
原因三，王子被认为是arsenic毒死的，在Naundorff骸骨的骨头里发现了砷。
但是lecture的professor认为，他不是王子。
首先，王子的习惯法国的历史都是可以经过研究学习的，而且这个人的法语很烂。
其次，这个人一直给真王子的姐姐写信，姐姐都不见他，而且，姐姐看过照片都认不出这个人是王子。
最后，教授认为arsenic在naundorff身上的微量砷可能是吸收了棺木里的，如果真的是被毒死的应该在骨头里的砷含量应该很高。所以教授认为reading不可信。
"
\"The lecture opposes the view mentioned in the reading with strong supporting evidences presented, aiming to further prove that Wilhelm Naundorff was not the lost prince of France.
Firstly, from the perspective of his comprehension of the royal routines, the professor states his doubt, because according to the lecture, the daily habits could be learned from history materials and he was bad in France, which indicates he could not have been the prince of France.
Moreover, judging from his behavioural similarity to the prince, the professor holds a different view, as the lecture further illustrates that he had kept writing to sister of the prince, but she refused to meet him. And also, the sister had seen his picture and found little similarity in his appearance to the lost prince.
Last but not least, on the point of the arsenic content in his remains, the professor never fails to express his concern, because in terms of the listening, the arsenic content may have been absorbed from the coffin after his death. If he had indeed been killed by arsenic, there should be higher level of arsenic content remaining in the bone. (191 words)\"
