TPO12综合写作

　　In the lecture, the professor thinks that the evidences linking the portrait to Jane Austen are not convincing. There are some loopholes that cause the assumption questionable at most. [表意清晰，不错]First of all, it is mentioned in the reading that Austen's family recognized the portrait as Jane. However, according to the professor, when being authorized, the author had already been dead for 70 years. [推理不错] As a result, those relatives of her could not have seen her themselves, making it doubtful whether their words are trustworthy. [信息很准，不错]

　　Then, the professor states that even though the face in the portrait resembled Austen, it is not necessarily her. The girl in the portrait could be a relative of Austen for it is known that Austen had many female relatives who or whose children were at teenage their years.

　　There is a popular [并未说是popular] argument saying that the portrait depicted Mary Austen, a distant niece of Jane Austen.

　　The professor goes on to discuss the links of the painting to Ozias Humphery, which is pointed out in the reading. He says that it is hush to relate the portrait with the painter simply because of the style of the painting. Instead, he talks about a stamp at the back of the canvas, which indicate [单数] the canvas sold by William Large. However,

　　Large only began to sell the canvas when Austen was at the age of around 27, which dose [拼写错误] not fit the age of the girl in the portrait. This is a good indication that Austen is not the subject of the painting. [层次很清晰，很好]

　　预估分数：4.6

　　信息很准确，也很完整，概括和总结能力也不错

　　表述方面，总体来说很好，很流畅自然。

　　有个别语法错误，要多加注意。