托福独立写作真题：城市领导如何保障城市繁荣范文分享

2017年10月13日14:45 来源：小站整理: 参与（3）阅读（12692）

摘要：托福考试当中，写作考试项目是最后一个考试科目，可能这个时候很多考生的精力都用得差不多了，但是托福考试的成绩每个考试部分都比较平均，你丢掉哪个部分你的托福总分都不行，那么你在备考时就需要每个部分同等对待。那么备考时你要做些什么呢?小编认为写作真题范文必不可少。

托福考试有一个大家都知道的规律，就是不断重复考题，例如2017年9月24日考试当中的每一套题目都是在历年来新托福考试当中都出现过的，那么大家备考时就需要复习这些真题很有必要。今天小编这就在这里为大家整理了2016年所有托福独立写作真题，并附有范文，希望对大家的托福写作备考有帮助。

2016年全年托福独立写作范文汇总：http://toefl.zhan.com/tfziliao62883.html

托福写作题目为：As the leader of a city, what would you doto ensure the prosperity and success of the city。下面大家一起来看看托福写作真题的分析及范文。

2016年托福写作真题题目：

5月22日托福独立写作真题

As the leader of a city, what would you doto ensure the prosperity and success of the city?

A. creating job opportunities for theunemployed;

B. lowering food price;

C. providing affordable housing

5月22日托福独立写作范文

题目大意：作为一个城市的领导想要保障城市的繁荣，要做以下三项：为失业人员提供就业机会，降低食物价格，提供经济适用房。波波建议选择为失业人员提供工作，证明其重要性，然后另外一段将两个选项的不必要性阐述明白。

托福写作模板及参考答案：

托福写作范文参考一:

In a society changing amazingly, that how to gurantee the prosperity and success of a city， the common target of all citizens，has always been brought under the spotlight of the massive media. When talking about which factor plays the most crucial role in ensuring city's smooth development, among creating job vacancy, lowering food price or adjusting housing price, people’s notion varies from one to another. From my perspective, providing job opportunities for the unemployed is the best choice.

In the first instance, offering job vacancies to the laid-offs will not only guarantee the social security and safety but also strengthen the purchasing power of the public. For one thing, given the indisputable fact that the unemployed without any income are likely to commit crimes such as theft of wallets or burglaries due to lack of daily necessities, it is self-evident that the greater the number of laid-offs is, the more unstable our society will become. Therefore, after satisfying their basic needs of life with the income from the job offered by the government, they will no longer be a threat to the stability of the whole society, which is the solid foundation for social progress and prosperity. For another, as long as citizens with jobs have more free disposable money and thus possess stronger purchasing monitory power, the various industries will be stimulated and propelled to a large extent. To be specific, with the accruing wealth, an increasing number of people will purchase a private car to commute to their office, with the result that the whole industry of automobiles will experience a booming period. The same logic can also be true of other industries and fields.

Furthermore, there are obvious disadvantages of the other two policies, lowering the food price and making the price of house affordable. Despite the fact that keeping the food price low and providing affordable housing will lessen the financial burden of the dwellers in the city in a short term, these two practices would hinder the future success of the whole society. To illustrate, the low price of food will definitely decrease the income of food producers, especially the farmers who support their family by selling what they plant and raise. As a result, they are likely to have great difficulty in making their ends meet, thus ending up becoming homeless or jobless. Also, in a long run, increasing housing affordability will put a damper on the citizens’ passion for creating wealth and thus decrease the dynamics of the whole society. Specifically speaking, when the price is so cheap that nearly everyone can afford it with ease, no one will work hard any more.

In a nutshell, I am convinced that the most effective and efficient way to boom a city is to create more job opportunities for the jobless.