第1题
来源:大陆
话题分类:Archaeology 属性:大范围重点预测
阅读要点
【阅读】认为存在。
1. 很多Greek的伪史学家都有清楚记载了它的大小和细节并且细节都相互支持联系。
2. 大帝建造过很多建筑令人印象深刻,因此也有可能建造过空中花园,此外还在花园里发现了R(?)。
3. 历史学家发现一些遗迹复合描述,文中还提到一群德国小队发现了花园地下有大孔有可能是水泵可以用来把水引到屋顶上去,来给花园灌溉。
听力要点
【听力】空中花园不存在。
1. 虽然被提及过,但是这些伪史数据并没有明确说明其所描述的就是巴比伦全中花园:此外,Greek的伪.史学家那时还没有出生,他们的记录都是在很多年后的并且他们从未去过那里。
2. 虽然他的建筑令人印象深刻,但是建筑用的的clay粘上无法与植物需要的R共存,即便当时有一个以适应的clay但是也在那里很难找到。
3. 花园和建筑都和复杂,大孔可能不是用来做水泵的.就算是水泵可是花园离水源太远当时的枝术是很难实现的。
第2题
来源:大陆
话题分类:Social Problem 属性:大范围重点预测
阅读要点
【阅读】The high-speed rail lines benefits people in US.
1. High-speed railway will save money spent maintaining the roads.
2. More citizens will choose to take high-speed train, which can relieve traffic congestion.
3. This means of transportation is one of the most environmentally friendly forms, because it is fuel-efficient while the train is running at a high speed.
听力要点
【听力】The benefits are not as obvious as reading suggests.
1. Compared maintaining the roads, building high-speed rail lines costs more. Government in California has to borrow 100 million, which takes up 75% of annual financial avenue. It is hard to pay back alone.
2. Whether people will choose to take high-speed train depends on whether it is convenient for them to go to train station. People need driving to the train station first, which is not contributing to solve traffic jams.
3. The railway cannot cover all the areas, and somewhere in California is speed-limited, so there is nothing different from regular trains.
第3题
来源:大陆
话题分类:Science&Technology 属性:大范围重点预测
阅读要点
【阅读】阅读持反对观点,给出三条理由
1. 首先,阅读认为,汞损害人的神经、免疫等系统,危害人体健康。
2. 其次,阅读指出,从牙医诊所流出的汞合金废物经下水道排进江河湖泊之后,会污染水质,进而威胁野生动物。
3. 最后,阅读声称,还有其他材料,比如金、陶瓷、树脂等可以取代汞合金,规避其弊端。
听力要点
【听力】听力一一加以驳斥
1. 听力材料反驳说,汞合金里的汞含量很小,不足以造成人身危害,只有少数对汞过敏的人会受到影响。
2. 听力表示,安装过滤隔离装置就能防止汞流进水路,造成破坏。
3. 听力表示,在口腔这种湿润环境下,汞合金更耐用,而且单价也比金要便宜很多。
第4题
来源:大陆
话题分类:Environment 属性:大范围重点预测
话题
【题目】讨论五大湖(the great lakes)是否应该建立wind turbines来发电
阅读要点
【阅读】3 benefits can prove why the great lakes should build wind turbines to generate electricity.
1. More job opportunities could be created for the locals, which increases economical benefits.
2. The great lakes are fresh water, which are suitable for turbines, and the maintenance costs will be lower.
3. Building wind turbines to generate electricity contributes to the conservation of water resources because there is no need to create more other resources with water.
听力要点
【听力】The benefits mentioned in reading are not convincing at all.
1. It is expensive for the company to build the wind turbines, so the costs will continue to increase for almost 50 years.
2. Fresh water is indeed good for the machine, but once fresh water freezes, it is more harmful for the machine, and it costs more.
3. Water flown by the turbines will be polluted by a kind of oil, which cannot be drunk again. However, millions of people depend on the great lakes for daily supply.
第5题
来源:大陆
话题分类:Biology 属性:大范围重点预测
话题
【题目】whether people should protect prairie dogs
阅读要点
【阅读】There are three reasons to illustrate the bad effects brought by those prairie dogs.
1. They are agricultural pests because they will compete with cattle for grass.
2. The fleas they carry can cause bacterial disease.
3. Protecting them hardly brings benefits to the ecosystem, so it is more worth protecting large mammals.
听力要点
【听力】The messages mentioned in the reading are misleading.
1. The agricultural pests view is outdated. On the one hand, prairie dogs have changed their diets. On the other hand, cattle now feed on some specific areas. So there is no competitive relation between them. What’s more, the burrowing of prairie dogs does not harm the growth of grass, but in fact makes the land fertile, which facilitates the grass growth.
2. The incidence of a disease is very low. In the past 15 years, only 10 people got infected.
3. They do goods to the ecosystem. First, the burrows underground prairie dogs big are habitats of other animals such as snakes. Second, they are also food resources of large animals such as foxes. The disappearing of prairies dogs will endanger those species.